Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Win32 regression test status

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>,"'pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Win32 regression test status
Date: 2004-03-08 19:26:55
Message-ID: 15067.1078774015@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Agreed, we don't add them to all joins, but don't we historically add
> ORDER BY to queries that are shown to be sensitive to qsort
> implementations on various platforms?  Are you suggesting we create a
> separate regression output file for that platform?

I'm not suggesting any particular solution yet, just pointing out that
there are reasons to look for alternatives rather than automatically
adding ORDER BY.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Claudio NatoliDate: 2004-03-09 01:08:34
Subject: Re: Win32 regression test status
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-03-08 19:21:04
Subject: Re: Win32 regression test status

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group