Re: Parsing of pg_hba.conf and authentication inconsistencies

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parsing of pg_hba.conf and authentication inconsistencies
Date: 2008-08-03 04:14:16
Message-ID: 15058.1217736856@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> True enough but perhaps that is a problem in itself. IMO, we should be
> encouraging people to never touch the postgres binary.

I don't buy that at all. pg_ctl is useful for some people and not so
useful for others; in particular, from the perspective of a system
startup script it tends to get in the way more than it helps.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-08-03 04:32:19 Re: Parsing of pg_hba.conf and authentication inconsistencies
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2008-08-03 02:47:11 WITH RECURSIVE patches 0803