From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, valiouk(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, dx k9 <bitsandbytes88(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [ADMIN] shared_buffers and shmmax |
Date: | 2008-12-16 00:35:38 |
Message-ID: | 14937.1229387738@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> I don't find it any clearer ... I think the missing clue is that if you
>> specify shared_buffers values in MB, you must divide the value by block
>> size.
> Well, the heading says "object" now so I thought it would suggest we are
> talking about objects and not bytes.
I'm with Alvaro: neither of those changes were improvements.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-12-16 03:13:21 | Re: [ADMIN] shared_buffers and shmmax |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-12-15 23:46:00 | Re: [ADMIN] shared_buffers and shmmax |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-12-16 03:12:32 | Re: triggers on views? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-12-15 23:46:00 | Re: [ADMIN] shared_buffers and shmmax |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-12-16 01:10:06 | Re: planner issue with constraint exclusion |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-12-16 00:32:38 | Re: Mostly Harmless: Welcoming our C++ friends |