| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh |
| Date: | 2000-03-01 06:29:25 |
| Message-ID: | 149.951892165@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
>> So are we willing to field questions from people trying to use TEMP
>> tables and trying TEMP and not TEMPORARY. I realize the restriction on
>> a field called TEMP, but we don't get those very often. How many people
>> are going to guess TEMP and not TEMPORARY?
> Well, that's one reason to stick to a published standard. No guessing
> required since one could look it up ;)
As of an hour ago, neither one is a reserved word ;-)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-03-01 06:46:28 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-03-01 06:18:41 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-03-01 06:46:28 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-03-01 06:18:41 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh |