Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-16

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL WWW List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-16
Date: 2009-06-16 15:04:25
Message-ID: 14885.1245164665@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www
Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> So the rest of us have to start filtering junk from our -www
>> subscription? Please undo this.

> Unless you have a better way of ensuring everything gets moderated.
> This was discussed last week,

Discussed where?  Not here, that I saw.

Personally, I'm perfectly capable of procmail'ing these things into
oblivion, and I'm sure most of the other subscribers to -www are too.
So in a week or so the only effect that these missives will have is
to permanently clutter the list archives.

(If you wanted actual shame, how about a report saying "so-and-so
hasn't done any moderation work in X weeks"?)

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2009-06-16 15:11:04
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-16
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2009-06-16 14:59:02
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-16

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group