Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #1609: Bug in interval datatype for 64 Bit timestamps

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Oliver Siegmar <oliver(at)siegmar(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #1609: Bug in interval datatype for 64 Bit timestamps
Date: 2005-04-21 13:57:40
Message-ID: 14859.1114091860@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugspgsql-patches
Oliver Siegmar <oliver(at)siegmar(dot)net> writes:
> It removed the bug, but also added a new one (hopefully only one ;-))

I don't think it's a new bug, seeing that I didn't change the code
for the ISO case.

I see the imprecise result only in the non-integer-datetime case; is
it acting differently for you?

If it is only the float case, some imprecision is to be expected.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: hyperspacezDate: 2005-04-21 15:01:20
Subject: BUG #1613: Installation flaw
Previous:From: Marc SoledaDate: 2005-04-21 13:56:35
Subject: BUG #1612: Problem with PGAPI_SetPos

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Oliver SiegmarDate: 2005-04-21 15:01:24
Subject: Re: BUG #1609: Bug in interval datatype for 64 Bit timestamps
Previous:From: Qingqing ZhouDate: 2005-04-21 10:12:03
Subject: revise a comment in CreateCheckPoint()

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group