Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
> I've now finished "polishing off" my old SSL code, and rewritten it to work
> with 6.6 (current snapshot). Included is the patch against the cvs tree from
> Jul 22nd.
Cool. Secure connections are good.
> Unfortunatly, in order to allow for negotiated SSL, this patch breaks the
> current protocol (meaning old clients will not work with the new server, and
> the other way around). I felt it was better to break this here, than to
> break the frontend API (which would otherwise have been required).
This is *not* cool. Breaking both clients and servers, whether they
actually support SSL or not, is a bit much, don't you think? Especially
when the way you propose to do it makes it impossible for a server to
support both old and new clients: by the time the server finds out the
client's protocol version, it's already done something incompatible
with old clients.
I think there must be some way of signaling SSL support capability
without making a backwards-incompatible change in the startup protocol.
At a minimum an SSL-enabled server must be able to accept connections
from pre-SSL clients.
If nothing better comes to mind, we could have SSL-capable servers
listen at two port addresses, say 5432 for insecure connections and
5433 for secure ones. But there's probably a better way.
BTW, it should be possible for the dbadmin to configure a server to
accept *only* secured connections, perhaps from a subset of users/hosts;
that would take a new column in pg_hba.conf. Didn't look at your patch
closely enough to see if you already did that...
regards, tom lane
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Thomas Lockhart||Date: 1999-07-23 16:30:15|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Phantom row from aggregate in self-join in 6.5|
|Previous:||From: Mike Mascari||Date: 1999-07-23 16:19:41|
|Subject: Index not used on select (Is this more OR + LIKE?)|
pgsql-interfaces by date
|Next:||From: Doug Thistlethwaite||Date: 1999-07-23 16:41:24|
|Subject: Connection from win95 to postgresql using JDBC and jdk1.2|
|Previous:||From: Jeremy Bettis||Date: 1999-07-23 14:25:53|
|Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Postgresql + lo |