Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD" <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)s-itsolutions(dot)at>
Cc: "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Euler Taveira de Oliveira" <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUCvariable
Date: 2008-01-30 18:07:50
Message-ID: 14808.1201716470@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
"Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD" <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)s-itsolutions(dot)at> writes:
> One more question. It would be possible that a session that turned off
> the synchronized_seqscans still be a pack leader for other later
> sessions.
> Do/should we consider that ?

Seems like a reasonable thing to consider ... for 8.4.  I'm not willing
to go poking the syncscan code that much at this late point in the 8.3
cycle.  (I'm not sure if it's been mentioned yet on -hackers, but the
current plan is to freeze 8.3.0 tomorrow evening.)

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2008-01-30 18:15:32
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanningGUCvariable
Previous:From: Christopher BrowneDate: 2008-01-30 17:55:55
Subject: Will PostgreSQL get ported to CUDA?

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2008-01-30 18:15:32
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanningGUCvariable
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2008-01-30 17:46:19
Subject: Truncate Triggers

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group