Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> writes:
> bruce(at)momjian(dot)us (Bruce Momjian) writes:
>> I have seen no one do peroformance testing of this, so it seems it
>> will have to wait for 8.4.
> I didn't have time...
> (e.g. - we've got a case where dropping the threshold to ~900 bytes
> would give us a big win for certain databases and tables.)
How do you know? Seems like you've got a readymade test case there.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Dave Page||Date: 2007-04-27 16:08:00|
|Subject: Re: [Fwd: PGBuildfarm member narwhal Branch HEAD Status
changed from OK to InstallCheck failure]|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-04-27 14:46:27|
|Subject: Re: Fwd: How does the partitioned lock manager works? |