Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Yoshiyuki Asaba <y-asaba(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net, andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net, kleptog(at)svana(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?
Date: 2006-06-28 13:54:21
Message-ID: 14709.1151502861@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Yoshiyuki Asaba <y-asaba(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> I think libpq interface does not use non-blocking socket.

Not unless the Windows port has also disabled pg_set_noblock ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Martijn van OosterhoutDate: 2006-06-28 14:28:44
Subject: Re: UUID's as primary keys
Previous:From: Yoshiyuki AsabaDate: 2006-06-28 12:27:42
Subject: Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Yoshiyuki AsabaDate: 2006-06-28 15:59:24
Subject: Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?
Previous:From: Yoshiyuki AsabaDate: 2006-06-28 12:27:42
Subject: Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group