Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: libpq 8.4 beta1: $PGHOST complains about missing root.crt

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Martin Pitt <mpitt(at)debian(dot)org>
Subject: Re: libpq 8.4 beta1: $PGHOST complains about missing root.crt
Date: 2009-04-10 20:13:31
Message-ID: 147.1239394411@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On Friday 10 April 2009 22:50:02 Tom Lane wrote:
>> I do not believe it --- there is a significant difference
>> in the difficulty of passive listening and active spoofing.

> Sure, there is a difference.  But what is it, and what percentage of users do
> you think are affected by it and can judge the difference?

I don't know, and I don't wish to be forcing a decision about it on
users.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2009-04-10 20:23:52
Subject: Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4027: backslashescapingnotdisabled inplpgsql
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2009-04-10 20:11:10
Subject: Re: libpq 8.4 beta1: $PGHOST complains about missing root.crt

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group