| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <stehule(at)kix(dot)fsv(dot)cvut(dot)cz> |
| Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Escape handling in strings |
| Date: | 2005-06-16 12:56:31 |
| Message-ID: | 14682.1118926591@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Pavel Stehule <stehule(at)kix(dot)fsv(dot)cvut(dot)cz> writes:
> what is wrong on GUC?
The idea of a GUC that allows security violations when it's set
differently than the application is expecting fills me with fear.
This is going to look the 7.3 autocommit fiasco look like a day
at the beach.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2005-06-16 13:06:55 | Re: Autovacuum in the backend |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-06-16 12:55:04 | Re: Escape handling in strings |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2005-06-16 13:49:35 | fsync under win32 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-06-16 12:55:04 | Re: Escape handling in strings |