On Feb 17, 2010, at 11:34 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Which leads me to the thought that rather than postponing running
> pgindent until late beta, maybe we should run it *now*, and get the
> bulk of its work done for the new code in 9.0.  Then people would have
> a solid base to patch against, rather than having to expect a major
> merge hassle at the end of beta.

I was going to write an email proposing  something along these lines,
too - so +1 from me.

...Robert

In response to

• A thought: should we run pgindent now? at 2010-02-18 04:34:24 from Tom Lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Heikki Linnakangas	Date: 2010-02-18 12:23:17
	Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Introduce WAL records to log reuse of btree pages, allowing
Previous:	From: Fujii Masao	Date: 2010-02-18 11:37:18
	Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL