On Feb 17, 2010, at 11:34 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Which leads me to the thought that rather than postponing running
> pgindent until late beta, maybe we should run it *now*, and get the
> bulk of its work done for the new code in 9.0. Then people would have
> a solid base to patch against, rather than having to expect a major
> merge hassle at the end of beta.
I was going to write an email proposing something along these lines,
too - so +1 from me.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2010-02-18 12:23:17|
|Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Introduce WAL records to log reuse of btree
|Previous:||From: Fujii Masao||Date: 2010-02-18 11:37:18|
|Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL|