| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, FAST PostgreSQL <fastpgs(at)fast(dot)fujitsu(dot)com(dot)au>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_get_domaindef |
| Date: | 2007-01-25 05:33:41 |
| Message-ID: | 14613.1169703221@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... convincing use-case that will justify the maintenance load we
>> are setting up for ourselves. "Somebody might want this" is not
>> adequate.
> I realize it is problem to have the function in two places in our code,
> but if we don't make a user-accessible version, every application has to
> roll their own version and update it for our system catalog changes.
Nope, wrong, you are assuming the conclusion. Exactly which apps have
to have this?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gavin Sherry | 2007-01-25 06:23:19 | Re: pg_get_domaindef |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-25 05:31:32 | Re: [pgsql-patches] unprivileged contrib and pl install |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gavin Sherry | 2007-01-25 06:23:19 | Re: pg_get_domaindef |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-25 05:31:32 | Re: [pgsql-patches] unprivileged contrib and pl install |