Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Feature Request --- was: PostgreSQL Performance Tuning

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Carlos Moreno <moreno_pg(at)mochima(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Feature Request --- was: PostgreSQL Performance Tuning
Date: 2007-04-27 14:36:40
Message-ID: 14600.1177684600@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-performance
Carlos Moreno <moreno_pg(at)mochima(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> But
>> the fundamental problem remains that we don't know that much about
>> how the installation will be used. 

> Notice that the second part of my suggestion covers this --- have 
> additional switches to initdb

That's been proposed and rejected before, too; the main problem being
that initdb is frequently a layer or two down from the user (eg,
executed by initscripts that can't pass extra arguments through, even
assuming they're being invoked by hand in the first place).

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Mark LewisDate: 2007-04-27 14:36:52
Subject: Re: Feature Request --- was: PostgreSQL PerformanceTuning
Previous:From: Michael StoneDate: 2007-04-27 14:30:25
Subject: Re: Feature Request --- was: PostgreSQL Performance Tuning

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Mark LewisDate: 2007-04-27 14:36:52
Subject: Re: Feature Request --- was: PostgreSQL PerformanceTuning
Previous:From: Marcelo de Moraes SerpaDate: 2007-04-27 14:34:28
Subject: Using a library compiled for 8.3 in 8.2

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group