Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>,Kaare Rasmussen <kar(at)kakidata(dot)dk>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item
Date: 2002-02-25 02:58:52
Message-ID: 14596.1014605932@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I have applied this minor patch.  I don't want to document the ability
> to use equals in this case because some day we may remove it.  The
> equals doesn't fit with any of our other WITH clauses.

One could argue at least as plausibly that we should allow optional '='
in all the other WITH clauses.  (That thought was why I renamed the
nonterminal to not refer to createdb.)

I'm also quite unimpressed with the notion of trying to suppress
knowledge of a syntax that is in active use by pg_dump, and perhaps
other tools too.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2002-02-25 03:06:20
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-02-25 02:53:41
Subject: Re: 7.2 stuff

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2002-02-25 03:06:20
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-02-25 02:52:04
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group