Re: Temporary tables and disk activity

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Phil Endecott <spam_from_postgresql_general(at)chezphil(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Temporary tables and disk activity
Date: 2004-12-13 02:35:33
Message-ID: 14584.1102905333@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Phil Endecott <spam_from_postgresql_general(at)chezphil(dot)org> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> In principle, therefore, the kernel could hold temp table data in its
>> own disk buffers and never write it out to disk until the file is
>> deleted. In practice, of course, the kernel doesn't know the data is
>> transient and will probably push it out whenever it has nothing else to
>> do.

> That makes sense. I suspect that I am seeing writes every 5 seconds,
> which looks like bdflush / update.

> But my connections normally only last for a second at most. In this
> case, surely the table would normally have been deleted before the
> kernel decided to write anything.

That does seem a bit odd, then. Can you strace a typical backend
session and see if it's doing anything to force a disk write?

(I'm too lazy to go check right now whether 7.4 handled temp tables
exactly the same as CVS tip does. I think it's the same but I might
be wrong.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-12-13 02:48:27 Re: Query is not using index when it should
Previous Message Phil Endecott 2004-12-13 00:46:24 Re: Temporary tables and disk activity