Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work
Date: 2008-04-01 14:06:01
Message-ID: 1452.1207058761@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-jdbc
Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> writes:
> Was the driver ever changed to take advantage of the above strategy?

Well, it's automatic as long as you use the unnamed statement.  About
all that might need to be done on the client side is to use unnamed
statements more often in preference to named ones, and I believe that
something like that did get done in JDBC.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Morris GoldsteinDate: 2008-04-01 14:12:15
Subject: Re: Can Postgres 8.x start if some disks containing tablespaces are not mounted?
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2008-04-01 13:59:35
Subject: Re: build multiple indexes in single table pass?

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Michael PaesoldDate: 2008-04-01 14:21:34
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work
Previous:From: Dave CramerDate: 2008-04-01 11:14:34
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group