| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Confusing Linux download page |
| Date: | 2010-06-16 20:52:43 |
| Message-ID: | 14491.1276721563@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> 2010/6/16 Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>:
>> But the RPM files themselves look the same? That seems confusing.
> They would be signed by different keys, right? Is there an easy way to
> view that?
It doesn't really matter whether there is a way for a guru to figure out
which is which. It is *not acceptable* for different people to be
generating different RPMs and naming them the same. The confusion
factor for ordinary users will be impossible.
Devrim and Command Prompt need to work this out between themselves and
come up with distinct naming schemes. If they fail to resolve it, core
will have to issue a diktat.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2010-06-16 20:56:58 | Re: Confusing Linux download page |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-06-16 20:45:10 | Re: Confusing Linux download page |