Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Are you planning to ignore my objections to it?
> The author replied addressing your objections and I saw no reply from on
> on that.
He replied stating his opinion; my opinion didn't change. I was waiting
for some other people to weigh in with their opinions. As far as I've
seen, no one else has commented at all.
If I get voted down on the point after suitable discussion, so be it.
But I will strongly object to you applying the patch just because it's
next in your inbox.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: David Ford||Date: 2002-06-20 21:30:49|
|Subject: cvs read lock|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2002-06-20 21:08:47|
|Subject: Re: Reduce heap tuple header size|
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2002-06-20 21:25:58|
|Subject: Re: Patch for memory leaks in index scan|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2002-06-20 21:15:15|
|Subject: Re: [PATCHES] PostgreSQL 7.2.1 and Sun's C compiler under Solaris8|