Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #1208: Invalid page header

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert E Bruccoleri <bruc(at)stone(dot)congenomics(dot)com>,pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #1208: Invalid page header
Date: 2004-08-16 16:13:05
Message-ID: 14383.1092672785@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> If you are sure your storage and memory are good, I can think of only
> two other ideas.  One is a gcc bug.  You are running Itanium so it is
> possible.  The only other possibility I can think of is that that our
> ia64 assembler code is wrong.  It is:

But that code is gcc-only, and he's not using gcc.

It's certainly possible that the non-gcc spinlock path is broken on IA64
though.  I dunno that anyone has ever tested that combination.  It might
be interesting for him to run the "test" program in s_lock.c and see if
it complains.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-08-16 16:20:55
Subject: Re: BUG #1208: Invalid page header
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2004-08-16 16:09:12
Subject: Re: [BUGS] 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group