| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert E Bruccoleri <bruc(at)stone(dot)congenomics(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #1208: Invalid page header |
| Date: | 2004-08-16 16:13:05 |
| Message-ID: | 14383.1092672785@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> If you are sure your storage and memory are good, I can think of only
> two other ideas. One is a gcc bug. You are running Itanium so it is
> possible. The only other possibility I can think of is that that our
> ia64 assembler code is wrong. It is:
But that code is gcc-only, and he's not using gcc.
It's certainly possible that the non-gcc spinlock path is broken on IA64
though. I dunno that anyone has ever tested that combination. It might
be interesting for him to run the "test" program in s_lock.c and see if
it complains.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-08-16 16:20:55 | Re: BUG #1208: Invalid page header |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-08-16 16:09:12 | Re: [BUGS] 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB? |