> Yes. What I was thinking of doing was committing a configure change to
> reject flex < 2.5.31, and waiting to see how much of the buildfarm goes
Actually, most of the buildfarm members show which flex version they are
running in the configure output. A quick look shows that of the 45
members that have reported on HEAD in the past 2 days, 22 are running
2.5.4, which is a lot higher than I was expecting. Most of these are
the Solaris boxen, which I imagine can be updated fairly painlessly
since there are some of them that are already running something newer.
However I'm a bit worried about the situation for Windows --- does
anyone know whether a newer flex is readily available for Windows?
In any case it seems like it'd be prudent to prod the buildfarm owners
to update their flex *before* we pull the trigger...
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-07-02 17:16:46|
|Subject: Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5 |
|Previous:||From: Kevin Grittner||Date: 2009-07-02 17:10:49|
|Subject: Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5|