Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: uuid patch 3.0 (8.3devel)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Gevik Babakhani <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: uuid patch 3.0 (8.3devel)
Date: 2007-01-28 16:40:06
Message-ID: 14304.1170002406@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> I think the copyright header on completely new code should just include
> the current year, shouldn't it? I've just marked both files as
> "Copyright (c) 2007 [PGDG]".

I've always made a habit of using the full copyright notice including
the UC Berkeley line, because hardly any new files that go into our tree
are really written totally from scratch --- there's usually a
significant amount of copy-and-paste of older code to begin with, and so
I think it's appropriate to acknowledge that the roots go way back.
Also, random variations in the format of the notice tend to fool Bruce's
copyright-year-updating script.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-01-28 16:42:24
Subject: Re: uuid patch 3.0 (8.3devel)
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2007-01-28 16:20:09
Subject: Re: uuid patch 3.0 (8.3devel)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group