"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
> On Aug 23, 2011, at 8:31 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Having done that, we'd mark all the standard "trusted" PLs as dba_create,
>> expand the existing definition scripts for the PL extensions so that they
>> fully specify the languages and their support functions (transferring all
>> that knowledge from the current contents of pg_pltemplate), and then
>> remove pg_pltemplate.
> What about untrusted languages?
Untrusted languages would still need to be installed by superusers.
At least, that's the policy enforced by the current contents of
pg_pltemplate, and I wasn't planning to question it.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2011-08-23 18:57:28|
|Subject: Re: Why doesn't psql use the information schema to get
ACL description ?|
|Previous:||From: Kevin Grittner||Date: 2011-08-23 18:07:33|
|Subject: Re: SSI 2PC coverage|