Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PERFORM] Direct I/O issues

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Direct I/O issues
Date: 2006-11-23 16:49:29
Message-ID: 14230.1164300569@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patchespgsql-performance
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> I have applied your test_fsync patch for 8.2.  Thanks.

... which means test_fsync is now broken.  Why did you apply a patch
when the author pointed out that the program isn't working?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-11-23 17:20:58
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Direct I/O issues
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-11-23 16:45:42
Subject: Re: Direct I/O issues

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: alfranio correia juniorDate: 2006-11-23 16:55:20
Subject: Re: Integrating Replication into Core
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-11-23 16:48:56
Subject: Re: Vacuum columns in statistics tables

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-11-23 17:20:58
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Direct I/O issues
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-11-23 16:45:42
Subject: Re: Direct I/O issues

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group