"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
> That does seem to work, yes. I thought there was some magic reason we
> were using PG_BINARY_W and not "w".. Assuming there isn't, attached
> patch is certainly cleaner.
Looks reasonable to me. Patch applied.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2004-10-24 18:35:56|
|Subject: pg_ctl -D canonicalization|
|Previous:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2004-10-24 15:42:43|
|Subject: Re: initdb conf-files linebreaks|