| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Jay Levitt <jay(dot)levitt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alex <ash(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Bug tracker tool we need |
| Date: | 2012-04-18 02:30:24 |
| Message-ID: | 14172.1334716224@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:47 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> That's probably one reason people aren't jumping on this. Because
>> there is no tracker out there that people actually *like*...
> I think this is a point worth serious thought.
Indeed. The only one I've got extensive experience with is Bugzilla
(because Red Hat uses it) and I do cordially hate it. At least some
of that is due to bureaucratic practices RH has evolved, like cloning
bugs N times for N affected releases, but I think the tool encourages
such things. So when I read Andrew's recent suggestion that we use
Bugzilla, my immediate reaction was "egad, can't we do better?".
Maybe we can't :-(.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-04-18 02:53:44 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't override arguments set via options with positional argumen |
| Previous Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2012-04-18 01:22:10 | Re: [BUG] Checkpointer on hot standby runs without looking checkpoint_segments |