Re: Direct I/O issues

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Direct I/O issues
Date: 2006-11-23 16:45:42
Message-ID: 14171.1164300342@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches pgsql-performance

Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> writes:
> The results I get now look fishy.

There are at least two things wrong with this program:

* It does not respect the alignment requirement for O_DIRECT buffers
(reportedly either 512 or 4096 bytes depending on filesystem).

* It does not check for errors (if it had, you might have realized the
other problem).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-11-23 16:48:56 Re: Vacuum columns in statistics tables
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-11-23 16:41:36 Re: [PERFORM] Direct I/O issues

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-11-23 16:49:29 Re: [PERFORM] Direct I/O issues
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-11-23 16:41:36 Re: [PERFORM] Direct I/O issues

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-11-23 16:49:29 Re: [PERFORM] Direct I/O issues
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-11-23 16:44:25 Re: Lying drives [Was: Re: Which OS provides the