Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgsql: Added new version of ecpg's parser generator script. This one wa

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Added new version of ecpg's parser generator script. This one wa
Date: 2011-03-10 04:08:37
Message-ID: 14164.1299730117@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committerspgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Michael Meskes wrote:
>> Added new version of ecpg's parser generator script. This one was written by
>> Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net>.

> Uh, why are we not just replacing the old script and allowing git to
> preserve the old version?

Yeah, I was wondering that too.  There seems no very good reason to use
HEAD as a historical repository when we have an SCM that does a very
fine job of archiving old versions.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Fujii MasaoDate: 2011-03-10 04:11:07
Subject: Re: Sync Rep and shutdown Re: Sync Rep v19
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2011-03-10 04:04:48
Subject: Re: wrap alpha4 tomorrow ~9am Eastern (was: Alpha4 release blockers)

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2011-03-10 04:41:12
Subject: pgsql: Mention gcc version in C comment.
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-03-10 03:39:36
Subject: pgsql: Remove collation information from TypeName,where it does not be

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group