From: | Palle Girgensohn <girgen(at)partitur(dot)se> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl? |
Date: | 2002-01-04 04:27:12 |
Message-ID: | 141540000.1010118432@palle.girgensohn.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
--On Thursday, January 03, 2002 23:03:11 -0500 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
wrote:
> Palle Girgensohn <girgen(at)partitur(dot)se> writes:
>> I am preparing the update of the FreeBSD port of PostgreSQL with the
>> upcoming 7.2, and I'm just wondering: is there any performance penalty
>> intoduced by including --with-ssl in the default configure args?
>
> Failure to build/run if SSL libraries are not available?
The main problem, of course, but this is can be handled in the port.
> AFAIK there is no run-time penalty, especially not if the server is
> started without the enable-ssl switch. But there had better be an
> SSL library to link with.
True. Thanks for the input.
Cheers,
Palle
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-01-04 04:32:26 | Re: Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl? |
Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-01-04 04:25:23 | Re: Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl? |