Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl?

From: Palle Girgensohn <girgen(at)partitur(dot)se>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl?
Date: 2002-01-04 04:27:12
Message-ID: 141540000.1010118432@palle.girgensohn.se (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
--On Thursday, January 03, 2002 23:03:11 -0500 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> 
wrote:

> Palle Girgensohn <girgen(at)partitur(dot)se> writes:
>> I am preparing the update of the FreeBSD port of PostgreSQL with the
>> upcoming 7.2, and I'm just wondering: is there any performance penalty
>> intoduced by including --with-ssl in the default configure args?
>
> Failure to build/run if SSL libraries are not available?

The main problem, of course, but this is can be handled in the port.

> AFAIK there is no run-time penalty, especially not if the server is
> started without the enable-ssl switch.  But there had better be an
> SSL library to link with.

True. Thanks for the input.

Cheers,
Palle


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2002-01-04 04:32:26
Subject: Re: Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl?
Previous:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2002-01-04 04:25:23
Subject: Re: Is there any performance penalty using --with-ssl?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group