Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 19:07 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The status of this patch isn't clear --- are you still working on it?
>> There certainly appear to be a lot of debug leftovers that need to
>> be removed, error messages to clean up, etc.
> It passes all existing regression tests and works fine for "correct"
I'm returning this patch for rework. You still have done nothing about
the above complaints (useless noise added to elog messages, elog(NOTICE)
debug messages that should have been removed, etc). I started to clean
this up myself but got too annoyed when I found that the patch had
removed security-critical checks that reject pseudotype result types.
I have other things to do than clean up WIP patches.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Mark Mielke||Date: 2009-01-01 22:56:23|
|Subject: Re: Copyright update|
|Previous:||From: Martin Pihlak||Date: 2009-01-01 21:10:38|
|Subject: Re: SQL/MED compatible connection manager|