Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_dump 7.4 bug

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump 7.4 bug
Date: 2004-03-29 16:01:40
Message-ID: 1414.1080576100@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> If you do this sequence of events, you get a failure to restore:

This is not a pg_dump bug.

Possibly ALTER USER should refuse to drop someone's superuserness if
there is content in the database that depends on his superuserness,
but I don't see how to enforce that.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Teodor SigaevDate: 2004-03-29 16:10:05
Subject: Re: GIST code doesn't build on strict 64-bit machines
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-03-29 15:46:13
Subject: Re: Row sampling..

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group