Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 16:24, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> ... The docs need
>> to state the truth, namely that "ident" is still allowed as a synonym
>> for "peer" on local connections. Otherwise people will get confused
>> as to why their pg_hba files still work.
> Hmm: Good point, update attached.
That looks OK to me.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2011-03-19 16:45:01|
|Subject: Re: Collations versus record-returning functions |
|Previous:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2011-03-19 16:02:15|
|Subject: Re: Indent authentication overloading|