Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 8.0.0beta3 duration logging patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Ed L(dot)" <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net>,PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.0.0beta3 duration logging patch
Date: 2004-09-28 13:59:57
Message-ID: 14108.1096379997@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Your issue brings up that the boolean API doesn't really work well, and
> in fact highlights the fact that printing the duration as an independent
> capability really made no sense at all.  Perhaps your approach is the
> proper solution --- to link them together.

I thought we had fixed things so that log_duration would print the
statement if it hadn't already been logged for other reasons.  Did
that fix get broken again?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Ed L.Date: 2004-09-28 14:59:47
Subject: Re: 8.0.0beta3 duration logging patch
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2004-09-28 13:18:04
Subject: Re: VC++ psql build broken

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group