From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0? |
Date: | 2007-04-23 21:57:37 |
Message-ID: | 14078.1177365457@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> ... should this be 9.0 instead of 8.3?
No. This is mere version-number-inflation.
Eyeing the patch queue and wondering how much of it is really going to
get in, I'm not sure that eight point two and a half wouldn't be a more
appropriate name. It's been a short devel cycle and one almost entirely
focused on performance, not user-visible features.
> Seems like it'd be both an annoucement of how far we've come, as well as a
> warning to users that the 8.2-->9.0 upgrade could be painful.
Why would you think that?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | usleepless | 2007-04-23 22:03:59 | Re: Wild idea: 9.0? |
Previous Message | Lukas Kahwe Smith | 2007-04-23 21:53:08 | Re: Wild idea: 9.0? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | usleepless | 2007-04-23 22:03:59 | Re: Wild idea: 9.0? |
Previous Message | Lukas Kahwe Smith | 2007-04-23 21:53:08 | Re: Wild idea: 9.0? |