Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Zoltan Boszormenyi <zboszor(at)dunaweb(dot)hu>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO
Date: 2006-08-28 17:57:29
Message-ID: 13996.1156787849@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Zoltan Boszormenyi <zboszor(at)dunaweb(dot)hu> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera rta:
>> Hum, are you going to put back the original cruft to support copy view?
>> I suggest you don't do that.

> Well, the other way around is to teach heap_open()
> to use views. Brrr. Would it be any cleaner?

Don't even think of going there ;-)

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-08-28 18:33:22
Subject: autovacuum causing numerous regression-test failures
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-08-28 17:53:19
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Zoltan BoszormenyiDate: 2006-08-28 19:07:10
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-08-28 17:53:19
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group