Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #2102: Backend reports wrong number of affected rows for a table that uses rules

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Brent Reid" <bfraci(at)aol(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #2102: Backend reports wrong number of affected rows for a table that uses rules
Date: 2005-12-09 16:41:26
Message-ID: 13978.1134146486@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
"Brent Reid" <bfraci(at)aol(dot)com> writes:
> Our Java application depends upon the return values from the various JDBC
> insert, update, and delete routines.  We noticed that the value is always
> zero when the table that is referenced has rules associated with it.

Have you read
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/rules-status.html

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-12-09 17:10:15
Subject: Re: BUG #2101: Postmaster Crash Using PL/PgSQL With %TYPE on Non-Exisiting Column
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-12-09 16:36:11
Subject: Re: BUG #2101: Postmaster Crash Using PL/PgSQL With %TYPE on Non-Exisiting Column

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group