Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> I just tweaked isolationtester so that it collects the error messages
> and displays them all together at the end of the test. After seeing it
> run, I didn't like it -- I think I prefer something more local, so that
> in the only case where we call try_complete_step twice in the loop, we
> report any errors in either. AFAICS this would make both expected cases
> behave identically in test output.
Hmm, is that really an appropriate fix? I'm worried that it might mask
event-ordering differences that actually are significant.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Fujii Masao||Date: 2011-09-27 05:00:14|
|Subject: Re: bug of recovery?|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2011-09-27 04:05:44|
|Subject: Re: bug of recovery? |