Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com>
Cc: lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>,Kaare Rasmussen <kar(at)kakidata(dot)dk>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item
Date: 2002-02-25 01:24:49
Message-ID: 13902.1014600289@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com> writes:
> The syntax of the CREATE SCHEMA SQL standard command is
> CREATE SCHEMA AUTHORIZATION userid
> Shouldn't we be using
> CREATE DATABASE AUTHORIZATION userid
> to be consistent?

Seems like a very weak analogy; there's no other similarities between
the two command syntaxes, so why argue that this should be the same?
Also, the semantics aren't the same --- for example, there's no a-priori
assumption that a database owner owns everything within the database.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-02-25 01:42:15
Subject: Nice Oracle tuning article
Previous:From: Fernando NasserDate: 2002-02-25 01:11:43
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2002-02-25 02:00:11
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-02-25 01:11:57
Subject: Re: Basic DOMAIN Support

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group