Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com>
Cc: lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, Kaare Rasmussen <kar(at)kakidata(dot)dk>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item
Date: 2002-02-25 01:24:49
Message-ID: 13902.1014600289@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com> writes:
> The syntax of the CREATE SCHEMA SQL standard command is
> CREATE SCHEMA AUTHORIZATION userid
> Shouldn't we be using
> CREATE DATABASE AUTHORIZATION userid
> to be consistent?

Seems like a very weak analogy; there's no other similarities between
the two command syntaxes, so why argue that this should be the same?
Also, the semantics aren't the same --- for example, there's no a-priori
assumption that a database owner owns everything within the database.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-02-25 01:42:15 Nice Oracle tuning article
Previous Message Fernando Nasser 2002-02-25 01:11:43 Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-02-25 02:00:11 Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-02-25 01:11:57 Re: Basic DOMAIN Support