Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature
Date: 2010-05-31 15:52:07
Message-ID: 13884.1275321127@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> If => is sql standard syntax then perhaps that changes the calculus.

Well, it *isn't* standard, yet at least.  All we have is a report of the
current wording of a draft that's at least a year from release.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2010-05-31 15:52:31
Subject: Re: no universally correct setting for fsync
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-05-31 15:48:24
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 release timetable

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group