Re: 8.4 open items list

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: 8.4 open items list
Date: 2009-04-02 18:38:06
Message-ID: 13884.1238697486@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> Now, what about the idea of providing a shorthand LOCALE='foo',
> mirroring --locale=foo initdb option? It seems like a good idea, because
> you almost never want to set LC_COLLATE and LC_CTYPE differently. If we
> do that, should LOCALE=foo also imply a per-database lc_messages,
> lc_monetary, lc_numeric and lc_time settings? It seems like it should
> for the sake of consistency.

The comment upthread was that we can/should leave that for 8.5.
I agree with that at this point. I think the above proposal is
not as straightforward as it looks (in particular per-DB lc_messages
has unpleasant implications for the postmaster log) and we should
not tackle it in a hasty manner.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-04-02 18:50:57 Re: [HACKERS] string_to_array with empty input
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2009-04-02 18:37:33 Re: [HACKERS] Mentors needed urgently for SoC & PostgreSQL Student Internships