Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> BTW, it looks like the patch is showing a manual change to
>> pg_config.h.in. Don't do that. Run autoheader.
> I wasn't aware autoheader existed. Is that new or has it alwasy been
> part of autoconf?
It's always been there, or at least for many years. pg_config.h.in
really ought to be thought of the same as configure: you don't edit
it, you just generate it.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Turner, Ian||Date: 2009-12-31 18:09:40|
|Subject: Re: Re-enabling SET ROLE in security definer functions |
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2009-12-31 17:50:20|
|Subject: Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking|