Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Instead of trying (and failing) to allow <<label>> at the end of

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Instead of trying (and failing) to allow <<label>> at the end of
Date: 2010-03-03 06:12:16
Message-ID: 13870.1267596736@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committerspgsql-hackers
Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> No, I intentionally didn't back-patch that. The only benefit of the
>> change is throwing a useful error message for questionable syntax.

> then, maybe a fix in the docs of back branches?

What's to fix?  The documentation already makes it quite clear where
you're supposed to put the label.  I think documenting the code's
actual behavior could only confuse people.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jaime CasanovaDate: 2010-03-03 06:37:30
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Instead of trying (and failing) to allow <<label>> at the end of
Previous:From: Jaime CasanovaDate: 2010-03-03 06:07:11
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Instead of trying (and failing) to allow <<label>> at the end of

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Jaime CasanovaDate: 2010-03-03 06:37:30
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Instead of trying (and failing) to allow <<label>> at the end of
Previous:From: Jaime CasanovaDate: 2010-03-03 06:07:11
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Instead of trying (and failing) to allow <<label>> at the end of

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group