Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> ISTM that writing an invalid-page table to the disk for every restartpoints is
> better approach.
I still say that's uncalled-for overkill. The invalid-page table is not
necessary for recovery, it's only a debugging cross-check. You're more
likely to introduce bugs than fix any by adding a mechanism like that.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2011-09-27 04:11:39|
|Subject: Re: random isolation test failures |
|Previous:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2011-09-27 03:29:00|
|Subject: Re: random isolation test failures|