Re: Pending query cancel defeats SIGQUIT

From: David Johnston <polobo(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Pending query cancel defeats SIGQUIT
Date: 2013-09-11 02:13:16
Message-ID: 1378865596238-5770394.post@n5.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Noah Misch-2 wrote
> The errfinish() pertaining to that WARNING issues CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS(),
> and
> the query cancel pending since before the SIGQUIT arrived then takes
> effect.
> This is less bad on 9.4, because the postmaster will SIGKILL the backend
> after
> 5s. On older releases, the backend persists indefinitely.

9.4 == head or is this is typo?

Your feelings on how far to back-patch?

David J.

--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Pending-query-cancel-defeats-SIGQUIT-tp5770390p5770394.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2013-09-11 02:45:05 Re: Pending query cancel defeats SIGQUIT
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2013-09-11 01:34:09 Re: Broken link in contrib/fuzzystrmatch/dmetaphone.c