Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Well, if you're going to change the contents of pg_cast then there is
>> little choice. I was considering something less invasive ...
> I will hang on to this patch for a few more days to see if any invasive
> catalog changes come out of the quote_literal/set_config discussion. If not,
> I'll consider a less invasive solution.
ATM it seems that consensus is to change quote_literal, so we may as
well adopt the cleaner solution for fixing the xml functions too.
Anyone out there who wants to argue against forcing initdb for RC1?
If so, better speak up now.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-11-26 15:26:24|
|Subject: Re: plpgsql: another new reserved word |
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-11-26 14:55:20|
|Subject: Re: 8.3devel slower than 8.2 under read-only load |
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Lew||Date: 2007-11-26 15:10:07|
|Subject: Re: Why LIMIT and OFFSET are commutative|
|Previous:||From: Sascha Bohnenkamp||Date: 2007-11-26 14:45:33|
|Subject: Re: replication in Postgres|