Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: "SMgrRelation hashtable corrupted" failure identified

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: "SMgrRelation hashtable corrupted" failure identified
Date: 2005-01-10 16:39:53
Message-ID: 13766.1105375193@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Comments?

> Only: Josh, put a hold on those press releases, looks like an RC5 is 
> forthcoming ...

I knew you were going to say that ;-)

I'm not sure if we should insist on an RC5 for this or not.  If we'd
found it after release we'd have stuck it into 8.0.1 without any special
extra testing.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2005-01-10 17:17:12
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] More SSL questions..
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2005-01-10 16:37:30
Subject: Re: "SMgrRelation hashtable corrupted" failure identified

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group