Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 09:00:11PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On tor, 2011-08-04 at 14:44 +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>>> I meant a mass "sed -e 's/TRUE/true/g' -e 's/FALSE/false/g'" run
>>> so all the ~200 occurrences of both "TRUE" and "FALSE" get
>>> converted so the whole source tree is consistent.
>> I would be in favor of that.
> I have implemented this with the patch at:
Does this really do anything for us that will justify the extra
back-patching pain it will cause? I don't see that it's improving
code readability any.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2012-08-14 21:36:35|
|Subject: Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false|
|Previous:||From: Michael Braun||Date: 2012-08-14 21:03:41|
|Subject: Re: superusers are members of all roles?|