Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hmm, is that the only place we missed it? Might be worth diffing a make
>> distclean'd tree against a virgin one.
> I was under the impression we only wanted a new version number with a
> configure run, however, I can see that "make clean" perhaps should do it
No, it's not the source code file he's complaining about.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: ramesh phule||Date: 2004-12-31 05:26:48|
|Subject: reqd patch|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2004-12-31 01:16:18|
|Subject: Re: Win32 version numbers not correct (again, but this one|