Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] non-functional update notice unneccesarily

From: Brett McCormick <brett(at)work(dot)chicken(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] non-functional update notice unneccesarily
Date: 1998-06-16 20:58:40
Message-ID: 13702.56448.140708.75744@web0.speakeasy.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
There are times when the message is appropriate, I believe.  But this
is not one of them.  Are all instances of this message gone, or just
this one?

On Mon, 15 June 1998, at 22:51:13, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > update mempayment set paywho = 'icvproxy' from do_addpayment where dappays
> > eq = payseqid;
> > NOTICE:  Non-functional update, only first update is performed
> > UPDATE 31
> > 
> > more than one update was indeed performed..
> > I beleive this has happened to me before..
> > 
> > 
> 
> Vadim has said to remove the message, and I have done so.  The
> surrounding code in heapam.c is unchanged, just the elog(NOTICE) is
> commented out.
> 
> -- 
> Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
> maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
>   +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
>   +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)
> 

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Brett McCormickDate: 1998-06-16 21:03:04
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] seq scan only when function not in subquery (bug?)
Previous:From: David HartwigDate: 1998-06-16 20:27:35
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Wishlist for next version: group by clause

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group